If you earn money recommending products — Amazon links, sponsored posts, referral fees — the FTC says you have to disclose it. Generate a compliant disclosure page in 60 seconds. Free.
Three reasons this one-page document matters more than most creators realize.
The FTC has issued fines and warning letters to bloggers, YouTubers, and Instagram influencers for failing to disclose paid relationships. A one-page disclosure is all it takes to stay compliant. The fines go up to $43,792 per violation. That's not per campaign. That's per post.
Counter-intuitive but true: readers who know you earn commissions trust your recommendations more, not less. Transparency works in your favor. Hiding it and getting caught is the thing that kills credibility. Being upfront about it is just good business.
Blog posts, YouTube descriptions, Instagram stories, email newsletters, podcast shout-outs — your disclosure covers every format you use. One document, every platform, fully covered. You write it once and link to it everywhere.
16 CFR Part 255 explained in plain English. No law degree required.
Here's the situation most content creators are in: they started a blog, joined Amazon Associates or a few affiliate programs, started earning some money, and never thought twice about disclosure. If that's you, you're in good company. Most creators don't know the rules until someone gets a warning letter. Let's fix that before it becomes your problem.
16 CFR Part 255 is the FTC's official regulation covering "Guides Concerning the Use of Endorsements and Testimonials in Advertising." It was originally written in 1980, updated in 2009, and updated again in 2023. The core principle hasn't changed: if you have a material connection to a brand and you're recommending their stuff, consumers deserve to know. A material connection includes money, free products, discounts, family relationships, or any other benefit that might influence what you say.
The FTC's view is straightforward. If someone on the street told you "this restaurant is amazing," you'd take that differently than if you found out they owned the restaurant or got paid to say it. The disclosure rule exists so readers get the same context online that they'd expect in real life. That's it. That's the whole philosophy.
Not per year. Not per website. Per violation. The FTC sent warning letters to Lord & Taylor after they paid 50 Instagram influencers to post about a dress without disclosing the relationship. Warner Bros. settled with the FTC after paying YouTube influencers to post positive reviews of a game without requiring disclosure. These aren't small operations that got sloppy. These are companies with legal teams that still got it wrong.
More things count than most people realize. The obvious one is cash — if a brand pays you to write a review or include their product in a post, that's a material connection. But it goes further. Free products count. Even if you didn't ask for them and even if you have complete editorial control over what you write, receiving a free $15 kitchen gadget creates a material connection that needs to be disclosed. Discounts count too. If a brand gives you 40% off as a "media partner," that's a benefit worth disclosing. So is access to exclusive programs, early releases, trips, event invites, or anything else of value.
Family relationships can count. The FTC has noted that if you're recommending your spouse's business without saying it's your spouse's business, that's potentially misleading. And yes, being enrolled in an affiliate program counts as a material connection even if you haven't earned a single commission yet. The relationship exists even if the payment hasn't materialized.
This is where most creators mess up. The FTC doesn't just require that you technically disclose somewhere on your site. They require that the disclosure be "clear and conspicuous." What that means in practice is that a disclosure must be hard to miss. A tiny footnote at the bottom of a 3,000-word post? Not clear and conspicuous. A disclosure buried in a sidebar that most people never look at? Not clear and conspicuous. A disclosure in your Terms of Service page that nobody reads? Definitely not.
The FTC wants disclosures at or near the beginning of content, before readers encounter the links or recommendations. For videos, that means early in the video and in the description. For podcasts, that means at the start of the episode and in the show notes. For Instagram stories, that means in the first frame, not buried after someone has already engaged with the content.
YouTube has its own built-in paid promotion disclosure checkbox in the video upload settings. Using it adds a visible banner to your video. But here's the thing: using YouTube's tool doesn't satisfy the FTC's requirements on its own. The FTC wants you to verbally disclose in the video too, and many creators include a written disclosure in their video description as belt-and-suspenders coverage.
Instagram has their "Paid Partnership" label. Same situation: it helps, but the FTC has specifically said that using platform tools doesn't automatically satisfy their requirements. They want disclosures that are unmistakably clear to the average person scrolling through their feed at 11pm. "Thanks to Brand X for this post" buried in a caption after several lines of text does not qualify. "#ad" or "#sponsored" in plain text near the start of the caption does qualify.
TikTok has a Creator Marketplace disclosure option as well. Like YouTube and Instagram, using it is good practice but doesn't replace a clear verbal or text disclosure in the content itself. The FTC's 2023 guidance specifically called out short-form video as an area needing clearer disclosures because creators were hiding disclosures in hashtags at the end of long lists.
A lot of creators think that writing "some of these links may be affiliate links" somewhere on their blog is enough. It isn't. That language doesn't explain what an affiliate link is to someone who doesn't know. The FTC guidance says disclosures should be understandable to the average consumer, not just people who already know how affiliate marketing works. "I earn a small commission if you buy through this link at no extra cost to you" is much better. It explains the relationship, the incentive, and the impact (or lack thereof) on the reader's price.
A dedicated affiliate disclosure page is a solid foundation. But the FTC also expects per-post or per-piece disclosures. Having a page at yoursite.com/affiliate-disclosure doesn't excuse you from including a clear note in each individual post that contains affiliate links. The two work together. The page provides the full details. The in-content note makes sure each reader sees a disclosure before they click.
Amazon's Associates Operating Agreement is even more specific. It requires that your site includes "a clear and conspicuous notice on your site" that you're a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program. Amazon's exact suggested language is: "As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases." Many creators put that line in their sidebar or near every Amazon link. That covers both Amazon's contractual requirement and goes a long way toward FTC compliance at the same time.
Every clause you need, nothing you don't.
A clear opening statement explaining that you participate in affiliate programs and may earn commissions on recommended products and services.
Named disclosure sections for Amazon Associates and any custom or private affiliate programs you participate in, using language that satisfies both FTC and program-specific requirements.
Covers the ways you may be compensated — commissions, flat fees, free products, discounts, or other benefits — so readers understand the full scope of your relationships.
A statement affirming that your opinions are your own and not dictated by advertisers or affiliate partners, which the FTC specifically encourages including.
Specific language for product review content that clarifies whether products were purchased, gifted, or otherwise provided and how that might affect the review.
Platform-specific guidance for Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube disclosures that aligns with FTC's 2023 updated guidance on short-form and social content.
A dedicated section for email recommendations, covering the fact that affiliate links may appear in newsletters and subscribers may not cost any extra when purchasing through them.
Specific language for products received free of charge, clarifying that complimentary receipt is disclosed and does not guarantee a positive review.
A statement that affiliate recommendations do not constitute endorsements of the third-party companies' other products, services, or business practices.
Your contact email so readers can ask questions about specific affiliations, which the FTC recommends as a best practice for transparency.
The questions creators actually ask about affiliate disclosure requirements
Why pay for something you can generate for free in 60 seconds?
| Feature | FreeTOS | Termly | TermsFeed |
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | Free | $14/mo | $9/mo |
| Signup Required | No | Yes | Yes |
| PDF Download | Free | Paid plan | Paid plan |
| Social Media Coverage | Full | Partial | Partial |
| FTC 2023 Guidance | Included | Varies | Varies |
| AI-Tailored Output | Yes | Template-based | Template-based |
| Instant Generation | Yes | Yes | Yes |
Two things to do: publish the page and add in-content notes to every post with affiliate links.
Go deeper on this topic with our free guide.